|
Simeon
Niel-Asher Launches Home Study Training Course for his Revolutionary Frozen
Shoulder Treatment
Osteopath
Simeon Niel-Asher is launching a home study training course to teach fellow
practitioners how to treat Frozen Shoulder Syndrome and other complex
shoulder problems using his revolutionary technique.
The course, aimed at osteopaths, chiropractors and physiotherapists is
in four modules and will enable practitioners to practise using the Niel-Asher
Technique which has been proven to significantly improve a patient's symptoms
within in weeks rather than years.* Each module provides new information
as well as opportunities for revision, including 'reflective-learning'
questions and practical exercises.
At the end of the course, practitioners must submit three patient case
histories, a completed research questionnaire for one or more of the cases
and at least one patient testimonial. I have designed a course that
will enable other practitioners to learn my technique, explains
Simeon. By qualifying as a Niel-Asher Technique practitioner, they
will not only be able to successfully relieve many of their patients'
shoulder problems, but they will also be able to benefit from membership
of the Frozen Shoulder Network and become part of an international community
of licensed practitioners - sharing experiences, results, viewpoints and
research to improve their practices.
Simeon Niel-Asher will be running a one-day seminar to introduce interested
practitioners to the Defrost Training programme. The seminar will take
place on Sunday 20th May at Regents College, London from 10.00am until
4.30pm. The seminar costs just £160 per person and six-hour CED/CPD
certificates will be issued to attendees. For more information or to book
a place, please contact Sarah Weldon on 01291 671 291.
The home study course is available by subscribing on-line and includes
membership of the Frozen Shoulder Network. Details are available on-line
at http://www.defrosttraining.com.
For more information, or to find out if you are eligible to train, please
call 020 8347 6160.
* Research on the effectiveness of the Technique
A recent study at Addenbrookes Hospital in Cambridge compared the Niel-Asher
Technique with physiotherapy and a placebo treatment. Six treatments were
performed over a nine-week period. Results demonstrated that this new
treatment significantly improved patients' range of movement, strength
and power; it was also effective over and above physiotherapy for decreasing
shoulder pain and disability. The Niel-Asher Technique is successful at
relieving the condition in nine out of 10 cases.
Back
into Shape Osteopathic Clinic
Back
Into Shape - the North London and East London Osteopathic clinics
were set up and are currently run by Simeon Niel-Asher. Simeon qualified
with a BSc (Ost) from the British School of Osteopathy in 1992 and a BPhil
in Complementary Health Studies from the University of Exeter in 1995.
As
a relation of Sidney Rose-Neil, one of the UK's most influential osteopaths
and founder of the British Acupuncture Association, Simeon developed an
interest in the field at an early age. He opened Back into Shape in Highgate
in 1994 and moved the Clinic to its current premises in 1999.
Simeon is renowned for his work on Frozen Shoulder Syndrome and has revolutionised
treatment of the condition with his unique and highly effective, Niel-Asher
Technique. He treats clients from around the world and jointly operates
a Frozen Shoulder Clinic in New York. He has also been named as one of
the top ten Osteopaths in London* and is the author of the best selling
'Concise book of trigger points'.
He is a well-trusted local practitioner with a client-list that includes
many people locally from North London and world-wide as well as a dedicated
following of celebrities such as George Michael, Eddie Izzard and Victoria
Wood.
* Evening Standard - London's top 100 complementary therapists 9th May
2001
Peter Clark
A keen sportsman, Peter spent several years in New Zealand mixing work
with competitive mountain biking and surfing. He is a regular competitor
in triathlons and has managed to work his love of sports into his profession.
On returning to the UK, Peter wanted to focus his knowledge on sports
injury rehabilitation. His qualifications as a Core Stability and Pilates
instructor complement his osteopathic training perfectly and provide him
with the perfect foundations for developing rehabilitation programmes
for Back into Shape's patients.
Julia M Spicer
Julia joined Back into Shape in 1992 retraining as an osteopath after
she had her two children.
Julia was inspired to retrain after undergoing a successful course of
treatment with Simeon. Before joining Back into Shape, she worked as a
care assistant in a warden-assisted home for the elderly in Southwark,
in a homeless project at London Bridge and at the Bank of England printing
works. She had also assisted at osteopathic clinics, dealing with sports
injuries and pregnant women.
Julia treats a wide range of conditions including Frozen Shoulder Syndrome,
IBS, PMS, low back pain, headaches, migraines and asthma. She also specialises
in treating problems that occur in babies, infants and young children.
Deborah Smith
Deborah qualified with a BSc (Hons) Osteopathic Medicine degree from the
British College of Naturopathy and Osteopathy and has worked in a number
of private and NHS clinics in Northamptonshire, Buckinghamshire and across
North London.
She has also trained in Core Stability Exercise, Podiatric Biomechanics
and the Niel-Asher Technique and visits schools to educate children
on good posture and exercise.
Deborah specialises in treatment of the elderly, ergonomic advice and
treatment and rehabilitation of sports injuries.
Paul Strange
Paul qualified at the British College of Osteopathic Medicine and specialises
in Osteopathy and Naturopathy.
He is experienced with sports injuries and is an expert in the use of
low level laser treatment to speed the recovery of soft tissue, bone,
ligament and tendon injuries. He also uses the treatment for skin problems,
ulcers and post-operative scars.
Paul is also an expert in Cranial Osteopathy and uses the application
of nutrition therapy for weight loss or gain, as well as to treat digestive
disorders and joint disorders such as arthritis.
For more information on Back into Shape, please visit http://www.backintoshape.com
or contact the Clinic on 020 8347 6160.
Weight-Bearing
Exercise Improves Bone Health
After
four years, Laurie Cohen knew the drill. Since being diagnosed with osteoporosis,
she had received almost the same news at every checkup - her bone density
had improved slightly, thanks to prescription medication, vitamin D supplements
and calcium supplements. But this time, in November 2005, Cohen's doctor
greeted her with big smile and a question: What are you doing different
from every other year?
Cohen's bone density had increased 4.4 percent in less than a year, an
improvement that Dr. Kathy Diemer calls impressive.
The answer was simple. Cohen had begun to work out twice a week with a
personal trainer. The additional weight training and resistance training
had done exactly what Diemer tells her patients can happen - it had enabled
her body to reverse bone loss.
Cohen couldn't believe it. It's not as if she were engaging in hard-core
training. She works out with a personal trainer for 30 minutes twice a
week and attends one 45-minute class, taught by one of the trainers. The
heaviest weight she uses is 12 pounds. And her cardio workouts don't last
more than 30 minutes.
The problem that most women have is you tell them they need to start
working out, and they think they have to start running marathons and lifting
100-pound weights, says Diemer, an osteoporosis specialist at Washington
University Physicians. But it's mainly basic toning. With cardiovascular,
you've got to get your heart rate up. But with osteoporosis, it's mainly
getting on your feet and walking.
Cohen discovered she had osteoporosis shortly after she turned 50; she
asked her primary care doctor for a bone-density scan simply because she
had read that 50 was the age for a baseline reading. She didn't expect
to learn about any problems, but she was told that her bone density was
so low that she already had osteoporosis in her left hip and osteopenia,
the precursor to osteoporosis, in her right hip.
In retrospect, Cohen realises that the news should not have come as a
shock. Her mother has osteoporosis. So did her grandmother. The family
history had never affected her diet or exercise decisions. I always
liked ice cream, she says, but I don't think I tried to get
calcium. And I'm not a milk drinker.
The diagnosis forced some changes. Cohen began to take 35 milligrams of
Actonel, a drug that slows the degeneration of bone, every Monday. She
needed calcium supplements. Doctors recommend weight-bearing exercise,
so Cohen continued to walk for about 20 minutes, four mornings a week,
although her years of walking hadn't appeared to help.
But it is possible at any age to make bones stronger.
We are always rebuilding our skeleton, Diemer says. We're
breaking down old bones, rebuilding and replenishing the skeleton in the
normal cycle of bone turnover. In osteoporosis, the cells that break down
bones, the demolition crew, are working too fast, and the construction
crew can't keep up.
Almost all osteoporosis treatments, she says, slow the demolition
crew, allowing the construction crew to fill in holes
in the bone.
Weight-bearing exercise stimulates the construction crew.
Says Diemer, All the stimuli are telling the bone, `You've got to
work a little bit harder.'
So when Cohen revamped her exercise regimen in 2005, it forced her bones
to work harder to replenish themselves.
Along with a co-worker, she had attended classes three times a week at
Curves. Then her co-worker suggested that they try a kickboxing class,
which they loved. When that class time changed, they found another class
at Club One Fitness in Creve Coeur, Mo. They figured they may as well
join the club.
We got a free session with a personal trainer, Cohen says.
And I thought, `Well, I may as well try this, too.'
She couldn't believe how difficult the workouts were. (And still are,
for that matter.) Squats. Lunges. Squat jumps. Her trainers varied the
exercises, which she did sometimes in place, sometimes moving across the
room.
For her upper body, she did push-ups, dips, shoulder presses, rows, biceps
curls, planks, crunches. She even began to use an exercise ball, working
on her balance.
You hurt, and you go back for more and wonder why, Cohen says.
But I knew it was good for me.
She had no idea how good. Only 10 months after she started, Cohen discovered
her surprisingly large change in bone density.
Everybody's bone is different, and there are some people who have
bigger increases than others - some bone is just a little lazier than
others, if you want to put it that way, Diemer says. We can't
always predict who's going to have such a response. She had an amazing
response.
Cohen is trimmer, fitter and healthier - overall and within her bones
- than she thought possible.
She still doesn't think of herself as an athlete, but she pushes herself
harder. Her walks have turned into jogs. Sometimes she squeezes in an
hour and a half of workouts, divided into 30-minute blocks in the morning,
noon and evening.
All of my friends know I'm into working out now, and none of them
can believe it, she says. But I'm very dedicated now.
She spends about $50 a session on the trainer.
It is expensive, she says. But if it's making me healthier
to spend that much, it's worth it.
BSO
Graduation 2006
This
year's British School of Osteopathy (BSO) conferment and awards ceremony
was held on Monday 16th October 2006, at the Mermaid Conference and Events
Centre overlooking the Thames at Blackfriars in central London. Friends
and family of students gathered to celebrate the graduation of students
from the BSO with their hard earned degrees. A number of BSO staff and
faculty were also present to witness the occasion.
The
day began with the arrival of students and their guests and a chance for
students to have official photographs taken in their academic dress.
Following this, students were gathered together in the auditorium, while
guests took their seats ready for the beginning of the ceremony. Prior
to the conferral of degrees, Les Ebdon, the Vice-Chancellor of the University
of Bedfordshire, gave a speech on the growing link between the University
of Bedfordshire and the School. Charles Hunt, BSOs Principal and
Chief Executive, reported on the School's activities over the past year,
and expressed thanks on behalf of the School to Dr Martin Collins, who
stepped down as Principal and Chief Executive in May 2006.
BSOs patron, The Princess Royal, presented the degrees and gave
a speech on the continuing development of the School through its increasing
student and patient numbers and the link with the University of Bedfordshire.
The Princess Royal also outlined the importance for the new graduates
of maintaining links with the School and of providing an evidence base
for the practice of Osteopathy as the next generation of Osteopaths.
This year 64 students successfully completed the course. Particular congratulations
go to the 11 students who obtained Distinctions, and to Stuart Walker,
who was awarded the Silver Medal. Stephen Sandler was presented with his
PhD, and an Honorary Fellowship was awarded to Dr Martin Collins. Dr Tamar
Pincus was awarded an Associate Professorship. Prizes were also awarded
to students from each year group of current undergraduates.
Following the conferral of degrees Stuart Walker gave a speech on behalf
of the graduating class, thanking the Faculty and support staff of the
School for their contribution to the successes of the students obtaining
BSO degrees this year. Following the degree ceremony, a reception took
place, allowing students to meet and 'catch up' with their peers and tutors
from the BSO. HRH The Princess Royal attended the reception and met with
graduands, their guests, and BSO staff.
Web: http://www.bso.ac.uk
Back
Into Shape - Osteopathic Clinic Treatment Case Histories
Miss AG, a 26-year old fashion buyer, presented with 'intense' headaches
to the upper front of her face and a constant 'pounding' sensation at
the base of her skull.
She had spells where she suffered this pain daily and also experienced
occasional 'fear' of bright light, nausea and blurred vision. Her headaches
had started when she was 11 and intensified when she reached 14. They
seemed to have improved with the contraceptive pill. Her doctor had checked
her thoroughly and declared her fine.
A
friend recommended osteopathy and suggested she visit Back into Shape.
The patient's muscles were extremely tense, her scalp was tight
and the movement in her neck bones was restricted, explains Simeon
Niel-Asher (pictured right, with model). This was a severe case
and hormones clearly affected it.
Simeon treated her with a combination of massage to her neck muscles,
manipulative adjustments to her neck bones and the use of a specialist
technique called trigger point therapy that is particularly effective
for treating headaches. It involves pressure on tender nodules embedded
within the muscle fibres; these are manipulated in a specific sequence,
explains Simeon. I also used cranio-sacral osteopathy; a technique
that involves gently cupping the head and putting light pressure on various
plates of the skull.
After seven sessions, for the first time in 10 years the patient reported
a significant 60-70% improvement. The patient continues to have treatment
every two to three months and a year on; she is virtually symptom-free
and rarely takes any medication. Simeon expects her to be totally free
of symptoms within the next eight months.
Knee pain
TK had been suffering from severe pain down his left leg for eight months
when he visited Back into Shape for the first time. The pain was causing
sleepless nights, made him 'walk like a cripple' and had so far not been
alleviated by any drugs or treatment.
Believing that the pain could be caused by a problem in his back, the
patient had been to see a physiotherapist who had referred him to a back
specialist at the Cromwell Hospital. An MRI scan revealed a 'narrowing
of the discs' (an incurable, degenerative condition) and the consultant
recommended that he learn to live with the condition.
The patient was referred to a pain management specialist who told him
that the problem could be cured with an epidural and x-ray to locate the
problem. When two epidurals did not do the trick - much to the specialist's
disbelief - the patient tried acupuncture and podiatry, but again had
an unsatisfactory outcome with both treatments.
When the patient saw Simeon Niel-Asher, he was surprised to hear that
his condition was nothing to do with the discs in his back, but was actually
due to a dislocated fibular bone. I was so amazed that my initial
reaction was 'is this good or bad for me?' he explains. Simeon
then proceeded to click back the bone - which took about 30 seconds -
and hey presto, the magician had cured me!
Frozen Shoulder Syndrome
60-year old MR consulted Back into Shape at the beginning of July complaining
of pain and stiffness in his left shoulder, which he described as 'sharp
catching spasms of pain and severe, debilitating night pain'. He also
had a very restricted range of movement.
His condition had begun with a fall in the snow four months previously
when he jarred his shoulder. His GP had recommended physiotherapy but
after five sessions and no relief, an x-ray revealed a 'spiral fracture'
of the humerus. A shoulder surgeon recommended rest, a sling and conservative
treatment but as the fracture healed, his range of motion and pain worsened.
Eventually he was diagnosed with a frozen shoulder.
Frozen Shoulder Syndrome is thought to last an average of 30 months and
seriously affects the lives of those who suffer. MR couldn't wait 30 months
for his condition to improve and was referred to Simeon by his GP.
MR was in the classic first phase of a frozen shoulder, explains
Simeon.
However, within three months of commencing treatment using my special
technique, he was 99% better. Simeon's technique has been clinically
proven to significantly improve range of motion and increase strength
and power over and above physiotherapy and placebos*.
*British Journal of Rheumatology Volume 42, Supplement 1, 2003, Article
418 BHPR p.146.
Lower back pain
MT is a 31-year old professional badminton player and coach. He consulted
Back into Shape earlier this year with a 'chronic ache' and 'spasms' either
side of his spine in the lower back that was significantly worse at night
and on waking.
His problem had started three years earlier after lifting heavy boxes.
As the pain worsened, he had been forced to stop playing badminton - his
life-long passion. Eventually a top consultant diagnosed a stress fracture
and spinal anomaly and told him to give up badminton forever and see a
physiotherapist.
Two years later he was still suffering and decided to go to Back into
Shape for treatment. On examination, the patient was found to have restricted
flexibility in the spine and part of the area was very tender to the touch.
MT was treated with deep soft tissue manipulation and some gentle 'functional'
work to the fracture site.
The pain disappeared within just three sessions and MT has returned to
playing and coaching badminton full time.
Atypical low back pain
SP, a 53-year old Company Director and sceptic, consulted Back into Shape
somewhat reluctantly, with two inter-related problems: He suffered from
stiffness and pain in his lower back and buttocks and experienced constant
left buttock, hamstring and calf pain that intensified through the day.
He also suffered if he lay too long in bed, lay on his stomach or played
sport.
His problems had started 28 years before with a severe prolapsed spinal
disc and subsequent surgical fusion of two vertebrae with two long screws
which had been left in. A keen amateur badminton player, SP had suffered
bouts of agonising spasm and progressively worsening pain and had tried
a number of treatments before being told that he suffered from 'wear and
tear' and a build up of scar tissue around the surgical site.
Simeon Niel-Asher treated SP from September 2005 for a year - a total
of 23 sessions. I treated the spinal muscles with trigger point
release around the sacrum, deep soft tissue massage and aggressive manipulation,
he explains. I also manipulated his fibula bone in his leg to instantly
relieve his sciatica which had been caused by heavy impact during badminton.
SP described Simeon's treatment as 'magic', reporting a 90% reduction
in sciatica after three treatments. For the first time in 15 years - and
over the course of his therapy - he reported slow but steady improvements.
By September 2006, SP reported a 95% improvement in spinal pain and sciatica.
For a sceptic, he was truly amazed; after 28 years of pain, he was finally
able to experience some relief.
Viral inflammation of the heart
EJD, a 25-year old engineer, consulted Back into shape with fatigue, palpitations
and atypical neck, shoulder and middle spine pain.
Her problems had started three and a half months earlier when she experienced
palpitations and felt unwell after a period of stress. Hospital tests
uncovered a Viral Carditis - inflammation of the heart; a potentially
dangerous, but self-limiting condition. EJD had no treatment options other
than rest, but suffered increased spinal and neck pain when she did so.
Having found that massage helped to relieve the pain, EJD came to Back
into Shape: Although this is not a condition one would usually associate
with osteopathic treatment, it is possibly a very interesting example
of a phenomenon known as Viscero-Somatic Referral where internal organs
such as the heart can cause a secondary spinal pain when they are damaged,
comments Simeon. This is not the same as the referred pain from
a heart attack; it is related to nerves that supply the heart and that
are also connected to the spine.
Techniques to treat this condition do exist in old osteopathic texts,
and although these techniques have fallen into disuse since the advent
of heart drugs, they are extremely effective.
Simeon treated EJD five times over a two-month period using a focused
and specific combination of massage, joint manipulation and old-fashioned
functional techniques. Her heart symptoms had already improved and she
is now virtually symptom-free.
For more information on Back into Shape, please visit http://www.backintoshape.com
or contact the Clinic on 020 8347 6160.
BOA
asks Osteopaths for Feedback on Foster Review
The British Osteopathic Association says that it shall be providing commentary
concerning some of the practical issues emerging as a result of the Foster
review in the October edition of Osteopathy Today 'but feedback on the principals
detailed in the reports must be our starting point'. Your views should be
returned to the BOA office by the 20th October 2006 so that they can be
built into the reply that will be sent by the BOA to the Department of Health.
The key issues are detailed as follows:
Promotion of osteopathy and osteopaths
The Foster report details that four regulators have a role to promote their
profession and proposes these regulators should be brought into line with
the majority. The GOsC is one of the four regulators and has a legal duty
under the 1993 Act to regulate, develop and promote the profession. We acknowledged
that the legislative review last year sought to re-define the promotion
role. As the core role of the regulator is protection of the public does
a promotional role, in any form, remain relevant?
If the regulator does not have a role in promoting osteopathy, this responsibility
will then fall to the professional association. The dynamics of funding
this enhanced and expanded role then becomes a significant issue as the
professional association only collects fees from its members. An equitable
way of dealing with this will have to be found. Currently the GOsC collects
registration fees so it can discharge its legal responsibilities and this
currently includes promotion. The registration fee would need to be adjusted
to reflect the loss of this duty.
Questions to consider:
a) Should the regulator lose responsibility for any promotional role for
osteopathy?
b) If so, should the registration fee reflect this reduction in responsibility?
Adjudication of complaints
The present systems generally employed by regulators may not comply with
human rights legislation.
There is concern that the regulators should not be prosecutor and judge
in its own courtroom, for which it has written the rules and criteria to
be followed by the participants. If the regulator is perceived to favour
registrants there will be suspicion that judgements will be too lenient
and will not secure public trust, yet, if the regulator is seen to be biased
against registrants they may feel the results to be unfair. This problem
is exacerbated if various regulators are perceived as taking differing approaches.
Foster suggests the following options for improvement:
1. Create one single and separate adjudicator for all regulators. This should
ensure a consistent and fair approach for all healthcare professionals.
The BOA believes that if this option were implemented the adjudication panels
must include adequate representation from each profession.
2. Create a separate adjudicator for doctors whilst preserving current arrangements
for the other professionals
3. All regulators retain responsibility for adjudication hearings but use
a panel drawn from a single, central pool, trained by CHRE and working to
common rules. This would deliver common and high standards whilst preserving
professional ownership.
Generally an approach of dealing with patient complaints (fitness to practice
issues) locally is proposed as part of the Donaldson report and would be
based on the GMC developing local regulatory representatives (known as affiliates)
who would work in the NHS structure and, as part of their role, consider
complaints at a local level, with serious complaints being escalated to
the national regulator. We recommend that members read chapter 10 of the
Donaldson report to understand this process more thoroughly.
Whilst there is no NHS structure for many osteopaths to use, the idea of
the osteopathic regulator developing a network of licensed affiliates to
handle fitness to practice complaints at a local level is an interesting
idea.
Whilst it is only touched on in the Foster report the BOA believes it would
be valuable to hear the views of osteopaths concerning this specific issue.
Structure of the regulatory council
Foster considers the make up of the regulatory council. There are two issues:
a) Some or all of the elected professional members of councils should be
replaced by appointed professional members. A clear person specification
is required which details desirable qualities. Whilst professional majorities
on councils could remain they would be made up differently with most or
all of the professionals appointed rather than elected. Public confidence
may be enhanced if they see professional members are not reliant on the
profession for re-election.
b) Comments are sought by Foster on the future balance of councils between
professional and lay members. The possibilities are a lay majority of 1,
a professional majority of 1 or no change.
Donaldson favours a lay majority as it will enhance public confidence with
professionally led regulation.
Revalidation
In many respects this is the major issue from the report that will affect
osteopaths in practise. Both Foster and Donaldson outline the need for such
a system. However, both reports consider the issue from the perspective
that the majority of people subjected to this will be employed and be employed
by the NHS. Using NHS processes and practices as a basis to hang
a revalidation process is key to their thinking. This creates a significant
problem for osteopaths as most work in small private practices and there
is no substantive employer-led structure to support revalidation.
Revalidation needs to achieve two main objectives as it should be a developmental
process and an assessment of current competence. It is quite different from
current CPD arrangements and it has the potential to be a demanding and
significant activity. Additionally, the cost to osteopaths must be a matter
of concern. As the significant majority are in private practice the time
cost and financial cost of such a process could create a very difficult
situation.
The BOA will ensure that it engages the regulator in discussions as the
processes develop but will also ensure the concerns raised in this section
are made known to ministers and the Department of Health.
Comments from members are particularly welcomed in respect of this issue.
Good Character
Foster outlines that many regulators require registrants to be of good character
but that there is no clear view as to what good character looks like. It
will require regulators to work to develop a common definition.
The BOA believes that this should be based on reasonability. It must differentiate
between minor transgressions and one off events and more serious breaches
of behaviour.
Comments are again welcomed
Registration of students
Donaldson cites research which outlines that certain conduct, performance
and behaviour displayed by students may be a possible indication of future
practice problems. As a result consideration is being given to registering
students as soon as they join a recognised qualification course so that
behaviour and progress can be monitored.
We would like your views on this issue and views form those involved in
the education of osteopaths are particularly welcomed
Conclusion
This is a complex consultation that considers many issues and aspects. We
have tried to distil out the essence of the key issues that we believe will
affect osteopaths in the foreseeable future. The BOA urges everyone to read
the Foster and Donaldson reports.
Please make sure you let the BOA know what you think so it can be the voice
of osteopathy. The window of opportunity to respond closes on the 10th November.
The clock is already ticking so send us your views by the 20th October at
the very latest
We will be responding to the consultation in our own right and want to ensure
we let the politicians know what osteopaths think.
We will be discussing this with the GOsC. We expect that there will be many
matters on which we agree. It is entirely possible there will be others
where we have divergent views. However, our role is to represent the views
of our members and to protect their interests. That is precisely what we
will do.
The Foster report is available on line at www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/72/95/04137295.pdf
The Donaldson report is available on line at www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/72/76/04137276.pdf
DoH
Launches Musculoskeletal Services Framework
It is estimated that up to 30% of GP consultations are about musculoskeletal
complaints. Patients suffering from musculoskeletal complaints have endured
some of the longest waiting times for hospital treatment.
The framework vision is that people with MSC can access high quality, effective
and timely advice, assessment, diagnosis and treatment to enable them to
fulfil their optimum health potential and remain independent. This will
be accomplished through systematically planned services, based on the patient
journey and with integrated multidisciplinary working across the health
economy.
The approach that will be taken is based on shared care and subscribes to
the following principles:
Understanding the needs of the patient population
Using multidisciplinary teams
Integrating specialist and generalist expertise
Integrating and co-ordinating care across organisational boundaries
Avoiding unnecessary visits and admissions
Providing care in the least intensive settings
The emphasis will be on prevention and self care with the patient acting
as an active agent rather than a passive recipient and on services that
are co-ordinated: from health information to initial points of contact with
primary care and referral to more specialist services.
Steps in the process are detailed in the document which can be accessed
on line at www.dh.gov.uk.
Part of the process will involve each health economy (PCTs and the like)
establishing a multidisciplinary clinical assessment and treatment service
(CATS). At key stages in the process allied health professionals are invited
to join discussions to develop plans for the establishment of this service
at local levels.
For Osteopaths working in the UK this offers fantastic opportunities to
work with the NHS.
There is a clear approach being proposed by the Department of Health that
is inclusive and fully appreciates the value that practitioners, like Osteopaths,
can add to the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal conditions.
To help and support members hoping to be involved in the development of
their local CATS the BOA will be looking to provide a guide for members
to use which will provide information on how to contact local decision makers.
We shall also be looking at the strategic alliances we can make on behalf
of members that will support their involvement in this process.
http://www.osteopathy.org
Bogus
Practitioner, Graham Hext, Found Guilty
A
bogus practitioner was found guilty yesterday on five charges of unlawfully
describing himself as an osteopath when not registered with the General
Osteopathic Council ( GOsC). Mr Graham Hext, 53, of Whitchurch, Shropshire,
was fined £15,000 (£3,000 for each charge) and ordered to
pay costs of almost £11,235 - a total of £26,235 - by Market
Drayton Magistrates' Court.
Mr Hext refused to plead guilty in the face of overwhelming evidence of
his guilt. With the passing of the Osteopaths Act 1993, the title "osteopath"
is protected by law. Under Section 32(1) of the Act, it is a criminal
offence for anyone to claim, expressly or by implication, to be any kind
of osteopath, unless registered with the GOsC. The GOsC is the only statutory
regulator in the UK that registers qualified osteopathic professionals
and sets standards of osteopathic practice and conduct.
When the Act came into force, any person wishing to be admitted to the
GOsC's Statutory Register had to undergo a rigorous assessment. This two-year
transition period commenced in May 1998 and only practitioners meeting
the highest standards were eligible for entry. Mr Hext applied for registration
but was refused, on the grounds of insufficient evidence of safe and competent
osteopathic practice. Mr Hext chose not to appeal against the decision,
and as such lost the right to describe himself as an osteopath in January
2001.
The charges yesterday related to signage at his practice and written information
he provided to patients, all of which suggested he was an osteopath. Despite
this, Mr Hext denied describing himself as an osteopath. He argued that
the Osteopaths Act protected the title 'Osteopath' and not the practice
of Osteopathy. He also said that his membership of the Democratic Osteopathic
Council (DOC) [ a membership organisation consisting of a small group
o f individuals who either failed or chose not to register with the GOsC]
entitled him to advertise his use of 'osteopathic techniques'.
District Judge Lawrence concluded, however, that as a result of Mr Hext's
advertising, members of the public would believe him to be an osteopath.
Furthermore, Mr Hext, by his own admission, said he practised osteopathy.
Judge Lawrence ruled that this amounted to a breach of section 32 of the
Osteopaths Act.
Chief Executive of the GOsC Madeleine Craggs said: 'This judgement makes
it quite clear that those who use semantics to avoid prosecution will
inevitably fail. We [the GOsC] will continue to prosecute anyone who unlawfully
describes or passes themselves off as an osteopath, in order to maintain
the reputation of the osteopathic profession and, above all, protect patients.'
For details of registered osteopaths in your area, please contact the
General Osteopathic Council on tel: 020 7357 6655 or visit the GOsC website:
www.osteopathy.org.uk.
Ernst
& Canter on Spinal Manipulation: Two Responses
Spinal
manipulation, as practised by chiropractors and osteopaths, is an ineffective
intervention for any condition, say Ernst and Canter in the April issue
of the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. Both the National Council
of Osteopathic Research and The British Osteopathic Association respond.
In the April issue of the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM),
authors Ernst and Canter concluded in their systematic review of systematic
reviews that spinal manipulation, as practised by chiropractors and osteopaths,
is an ineffective intervention for any condition. Furthermore, the authors
went on to say that given the possibility of adverse effects, the review
suggests that spinal manipulation is not a recommendable treatment.
In response, members of the National Council of Osteopathic Research (NCOR),
and others from the chiropractic and research fields, wrote to the JRSM
outlining their concerns over the review. These included how Ernst and
Canter seemed to consider different types of manual intervention interchangeably
when they are, in fact, distinct and produce 'differing physiological
effects'.
NCOR also comments on the exclusion of more recent studies such as that
by Licciardone et al. (see: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/6/43/abstract),
which demonstrated osteopathic manipulative treatment does significantly
reduce low back pain.
Meanwhile, in a statement from The British Osteopathic Association in
response to The Royal Society of Medicine press release, Nigel Graham,
President of the BOA, comments:
'The British Osteopathic Association (BOA) welcomes any research into
the causes and treatment of chronic back pain which severely affects the
lives of around one in seven people in the UK.
'Osteopathy uniquely treats the whole body and more specifically the cause,
not just the immediate location of the pain. The body has a natural ability
to self-regulate and self-repair and osteopaths rely on this innate healing
ability to treat their patients.
'Spinal Manipulation is just one of the techniques which osteopaths use
and there is a general consensus that osteopathy is less risky in terms
of spinal injuries because osteopaths usually use less forceful manipulation
techniques on the spine.
'Recent independent research suggests that a combination of spinal manipulation,
general exercise and active management may produce most relief for back
pain sufferers, helping them return to their normal activities'.
The Medical Research Council in November 2004 published research that
found that osteopathy, chiropractic or manipulative physiotherapy - plus
an exercise programme - was the most effective treatment for people suffering
from a bad back.
Back pain is so widespread and so costly to society that the use of osteopathy,
along with treatment from GPs, can add up to substantial economic benefits
to the NHS.
Please contact: Nigel Graham British Osteopathic Association
Tel: 01582 488455
E-mail: Nigel@osteopathy.org.
Osteopathic
Research into ME
At
a recent meeting of the Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), members received osteopathic research
findings with interest.
ME, the symptoms of which include unexplained exhaustion, muscle and joint
pain, insomnia and nausea, has remained somewhat of a mystery to the medical
profession for many years.
The Group, chaired by Dr Ian Gibson MP, is looking at progress made in
understanding the cause of the condition since the Chief Medical Officer's
Report into ME in 2002. It has heard from sufferers of ME, and will hear
further evidence from leading medical experts and government officials.
Osteopath Raymond Perrin PhD has been researching the cause of ME, also
known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, for the last 17 years. Following clinical
trials at the Universities of Salford and Manchester, he has developed
a diagnostic and treatment approach which he believes could provide significant
benefits to sufferers.
Dr Perrin says, 'The group seemed interested in the physical signs that
I have discovered. These signs are common to the hundreds of ME sufferers
I have treated since 1989. However, further research is necessary to validate
these findings which, if successfully confirmed, may make diagnosis easier
and quicker, enabling patients to receive earlier treatment and a speedier
recovery.'
Heart
Attack Risk Highlights Need for Alternatives
A
new study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) confirms what
has long been suspected in the medical community that high doses
of common painkillers, such as ibuprofen and diclofenac, can double the
risk of heart attack.
Patients are reassured that the risk of heart attack is moderate and the
study findings relate only to the highest doses recommended by medics.
Nevertheless, for patients who daily suffer chronic debilitating pain,
such as arthritis or back pain, consumption of these non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDS) are commonly high.
'Doctors and patients need to work together to find suitable alternatives
to reduce the dose of NSAIDS and reduce the very real risk of vascular
events,' stresses Dr Leslie Wootton, GP and osteopath. 'I always strive
to make my patients aware of all their options, particularly those with
musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Osteopathy can do much to alleviate
pain, improve patients' mobility, and generally make life more comfortable
without the need for drugs.'
An estimated 25,000 people consult an osteopath every day for common problems
such as back and neck pain, as well as sciatica, headaches, postural problems,
repetitive strain injury, driving and work strain, the pain of arthritis
and sports injuries.
Madeleine Craggs, Chief Executive & Registrar of the General Osteopathic
Council (GOsC), concluded: With MSDs making up 20% of GP consultations
and this new piece of research confirming the risks of common painkillers,
it is essential that patients with debilitating pain are offered effective
alternatives.
'Osteopaths are highly skilled health professionals, an integral part
of primary care teams. Their work already does much to reduce the number
of GP consultations and the cost and quantity of painkilling drugs prescribed.
This study underlines the need for patients to understand the best treatment
options for their health.'.
Efficacy
of Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate may Depend on Level of Osteoarthritis
Pain
In
a study published in the New England Journal of Medicinei , the popular
dietary supplement combination of glucosamine plus chondroitin sulfate
did not provide significant relief from osteoarthritis pain among all
participants.
However, a smaller subgroup of study participants with moderate-to-severe
pain showed significant relief with the combined supplements. This research
was funded by the National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
(NCCAM) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and
Skin Diseases (NIAMS), components of the National Institutes of Health
(NIH). Researchers led by rheumatologist Daniel O. Clegg, M.D., of the
University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, conducted the
4-year study known as the Glucosamine/chondroitin Arthritis Intervention
Trial (GAIT) at 16 sites across the United States.
'GAIT is another example of NIH's commitment to exploring the potential
of complementary and alternative medicine to prevent and treat disease
in a manner that is fair, unbiased, and scientifically rigorous,' said
Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., NIH Director.
GAIT enrolled nearly 1,600 participants with documented osteoarthritis
of the knee. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of five
treatments daily for 24 weeks: glucosamine alone (1500 mg), chondroitin
sulfate alone (1200 mg), glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate combined
(same doses), a placebo, or celecoxib (200 mg). Celecoxib is an FDA-approved
drug for the management of osteoarthritis pain and served as a positive
control for the study. (A positive control is a treatment that investigators
expect participants to respond to in a predictable way; it helps validate
study results.) A positive response to treatment was defined as a 20 percent
or greater reduction in pain at week 24 compared to the start of the study.
The researchers found that participants taking celecoxib experienced statistically
significant pain relief, as expected, versus placebo--about 70 percent
of those taking celecoxib versus 60 percent taking placebo had a 20 percent
or greater pain reduction. For all participants, there were no significant
differences between the other treatments tested and placebo. However,
for participants in the moderate-to-severe pain subgroup, glucosamine
combined with chondroitin sulfate provided statistically significant pain
relief compared to placebo - about 79 percent in this group had a 20 percent
or greater pain reduction compared to 54 percent for placebo. In the subgroup
of participants with mild pain, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate together
or alone did not provide statistically significant relief compared to
placebo.
'This rigorous, large-scale study showed that the combination of glucosamine
and chondroitin sulfate appeared to help people with moderate-to-severe
pain from knee osteoarthritis, but not those with mild pain,' said Stephen
E. Straus, M.D., NCCAM Director. 'It is important to study dietary supplements
with well-designed research in order to find out what works and what does
not.'
'Because of the small size of the moderate-to-severe pain subgroup, the
findings in this group for glucosamine plus chondroitin sulfate should
be considered preliminary and need to be confirmed in a study designed
for this purpose,' said Dr. Clegg, Professor of Medicine and Chief of
Rheumatology at the University of Utah, School of Medicine.
On entering the study, a participant's level of pain was assessed as either
mild or moderate to severe using standard pain assessment tools and scales,
such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
(WOMAC). Of the 1,583 study participants, 78 percent were in the mild
pain subgroup and the other 22 percent were in the moderate-to-severe
pain subgroup. Level of pain was evaluated at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 using
the WOMAC scale and other tools. In addition to taking their daily study
treatment, participants could take up to 4000 mg of acetaminophen daily
for pain, except for the 24 hours before they were assessed by study staff.
The use of acetaminophen, however, was low, overall averaging fewer than
two 500 mg tablets per day. Participants could not take other non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory medicines or narcotic (opioid-based) pain relievers
during the study.
'More than 20 million Americans have osteoarthritis, making it a frequent
cause of physical disability among adults,' said Stephen I. Katz, M.D.,
Ph.D., NIAMS Director. 'We are excited to support studies looking at new
treatment options that could improve the symptoms and quality of life
of people with osteoarthritis.'
GAIT was conducted under an Investigational New Drug application filed
with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Thus, all of the products
used in the study were subject to the FDA's pharmaceutical regulations
and evaluated and manufactured by an FDA-licensed clinical research pharmacy
centre. The glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate used were tested for purity,
potency, quality, and consistency among batches. Products were retested
for stability throughout the study. The dosages selected were based on
the prevailing doses in the scientific literature. Few side effects from
any of the treatments were reported. Those reported were generally mild,
such as upset stomach, and distributed evenly across the treatment groups.
'The GAIT team's goal was to assess whether glucosamine and chondroitin
sulfate, which we saw our osteoarthritis patients using, provided pain
relief,' said Dr. Clegg. 'I urge people with osteoarthritis to follow
a comprehensive plan for managing their arthritis pain - eat right, exercise,
lose excess weight, and talk to your physician about appropriate treatment
options.'
The GAIT team continues their research with a smaller study to see whether
glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate can alter the progression of osteoarthritis,
such as delaying the narrowing of the joint spaces. About one-half of
the participants in the larger GAIT study were eligible to enroll in this
ancillary study. The results are expected in about a year.
iClegg D, et al. Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulfate, and the Two in Combination
for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis. New England Journal of Medicine, 2006;354:795-808.
AAO
Members in the News
Dennis
Dowling, DO,
was in New York earlier this year, promoting osteopathic medicine during
a national satellite media tour. Reporters from 17 TV and radio stations,
spanning from Boston to Kirksville to Seattle, interviewed Dr. Dowling,
who is a member of the editorial advisory board for the JAOA. Dr. Dowling
spoke about using osteopathic manipulative treatment to treat patients
during the 1917-18 flu pandemic and how the same treatments can be used
today to treat similar illnesses including bird flu in the event of a
pandemic. In addition, he demonstrated OMT for TV audiences. A past president
of the American Academy of Osteopathy, he described the experience in
the paragraphs below. (Source: AOA Executive Director's Daily Report 1-14/06).
'The occasion was arranged by the American Osteopathic Association (A.O.A)
and utilised the interest in treatment of patients with influenza, especially
in light of the current concern with the avian flu. In 1918, another flu
outbreak known as the Spanish flu pandemic killed 500,000 Americans and
at least 20 million people worldwide. Usually flu outbreaks are related
to 30,000 deaths in the U.S. with the large majority being those with
immature (infants) or damaged immune systems (i.e. elderly, asthmatics,
patients with emphysema, AIDS, renal failure, etc.). In the early twentieth
century, osteopathic physicians comprised 5% of the physicians in the
U.S. but apparently treated up to 10% of the patients in the country since
many M.D.s were away in Europe during WWI. The mortality rate reported
by osteopathic physicians was 0.25% vs. the 6-10% reported otherwise in
the United States. In a survey article in the Journal of the American
Osteopathic Association of that era, 2,000 D.O.s reported 275 deaths out
of 110,000 cases treated. The treatments that were utilized addressed
the whole patient but specifically worked on the respiratory and immunological
systems. These techniques have also been found recently to decrease hospital
stays and intravenous antibiotic needs of elderly patients as well as
increase antibody levels in normal subjects following some vaccinations.
'The reader can see some of the videos that were recorded by news stations
during my satellite media tour. Ignore the first one (it concerns disciplinary
action against a D.O. in that community - the tracking service just picks
up the term "osteopathic" and relays it to the A.O.A.) and the
last one (The station had an ice storm the night before and we had good
audio feed but they stated that the visuals were hazy). The last station
went with stock videos that were broadcast to them previously. The quickview
format skips many frames but the audio plays pretty well. Occasionally
there are pauses between questions and responses due to delays that the
stations apparently employ during live transmissions.
http://media.vmsnews.com/MonitoringReports/011206/518631/I00049104'
The University of New England College of Osteopathic
Medicine has confirmed the appointment of AAO President-elect
Kenneth H. Johnson, DO as Interim Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs,
effective March 2006. A 1992 graduate of UNECOM, Dr. Johnson currently
serves as Chief Medical Officer of Health Access Network in West Enfield,
ME. He formerly served as director of the NMM/OMM Plus One residency program
at Eastern Maine Medical Centre in Bangor. He is certified in osteopathic
family practice as well as neuromusculoskeletal medicine and osteopathic
manipulative medicine. Dr. Johnson replaces Boyd R. Buser, DO who recently
assumed the position of Interim Dean and Vice President for Health Services
at UNECOM.
Keith Barbour, DO of Monroe, MI served
as the USA team physician at the 2005 World Disabled Water Ski Championships
in Schoten, Belgium, September 8-11. Dr. Barbour is a 1983 graduate of
the Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, who completed
his physical medicine and rehabilitation residency at Detroit Rehabilitation
Institute. Dr. Barbour operates Rehabilitation Specialists in Monroe.
He is certified in physical medicine and rehabilitation, a Fellow of the
American Osteopathic College of Rehabilitation Medicine, and a diplomate
of the American Academy of Pain Management. He has been an active AAO
member since he graduated from MSU-COM.
RETURN
TO HOME PAGE
|